Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
The never-ending editing draft...(this took five monthsđź« ) | WRITING VLOG thumbnail

The never-ending editing draft...(this took five monthsđź« ) | WRITING VLOG

ShaelinWrites·
6 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

The animal-sense manuscript is being revised through multiple developmental drafts, with voice and relationship conveyance treated as major revision targets rather than minor polish.

Briefing

Revisions for ShaelinWrites’ animal-sense manuscript (formerly Salt Birds) are entering a long, multi-draft stretch—driven less by plot mechanics than by voice, pacing, and how intricate relationships land with readers. The central priority is line-level development: the draft’s language needs more “sparkle” and electric intensity, especially in the early chapters, where the author has already made meaningful tweaks that make the prose feel more alive and tonally aligned with the story’s weird, new-age-tinged atmosphere.

Work begins with a reset of expectations: one messy subplot thread may be cut or radically reworked later, but the author is choosing to postpone that uncertainty while pushing through clearer edits first. That approach reflects a broader editing philosophy—accepting that not everything can be fixed in a single pass. The author frames the project as requiring several rounds of developmental editing, not one heavy overhaul followed by lighter polishing. Even with substantial improvements, some sections remain “glaring” problem areas, and reader feedback is expected to be necessary not just to confirm what’s working, but to diagnose where the story fails to convey the intended meaning.

Chapter-by-chapter progress shows a pattern: early chapters tend to move slowly at first, then accelerate once the author hits a groove. By the time edits reach the middle of the book, the author is finding “juicy” plot development and feeling energized, even while worrying that certain slow sections may actually be too slow on the page—an issue the author suspects could require condensing. Part two is singled out as a recurring trouble spot: editing it previously improved quality, but pacing still might be dragging, and the ending’s final scene still doesn’t feel right.

The manuscript’s structure is also under reconsideration. The author is considering removing the “parts” framework and relying instead on titled chapters to create a smoother, continuous arc in the published format. Chapter titles are not just decorative; they’re tied to the book’s aesthetic goal—an uneasy new-age vibe. The main character’s world includes spiritualist themes even when the protagonist doesn’t fully buy into them, and side character Susanna is described as reading pop psychology and referencing the law of attraction. Titles (including some named after tarot cards) are intended to reinforce that thematic atmosphere and cohesion.

Despite moments of strong conviction—roughly a third of scenes that feel fully real to the author—other portions still don’t land with the same impact. The author estimates the draft is around 70% complete, with about a third of scenes “incredible,” another third mixed, and the remainder not yet convincing enough for a reader. The next draft plan includes removing an entire plot thread, condensing where possible, and replacing certain causal beats with new ones that tie into existing threads. The author also uses a color-coded chart to track chapter readiness (complete, strong, okay, weak), then targets weak chapters for restructuring—especially chapters 11 and 13, where a subplot currently feels inconsequential.

Alongside the editing grind, the author reports a rare experience: a revision day that felt like drafting in flow state, turning underwritten scenes into more nuanced, convincing material. Still, the work is expanding in scope, with deadlines shaped by travel (including a Southeast Asia trip) and the intention to finish this project before starting the next. The immediate goal is to stabilize voice, tighten chapter arcs, and set up the manuscript for the feedback stage where relationship intricacy can be tested against real reader interpretation—particularly how well the emotional and thematic intentions are conveyed.

Cornell Notes

The author is revising an animal-sense manuscript (formerly Salt Birds) through multiple developmental drafts, with voice and relationship conveyance as the biggest pressure points. Early chapters have improved through targeted line-level edits, adding “sparkle” and more electric, tonally rich language, but the overall voice still isn’t as fully developed as in Honey vinegar and holding a ghost. Pacing and structure remain uneven—part two and the ending’s final scene are recurring concerns—and the author is considering removing the “parts” layout in favor of titled chapters to strengthen cohesion and vibe. A color-coded chapter chart guides the next pass, including cutting an entire plot thread and replacing certain causal beats. The author expects to need feedback not only to confirm what works, but to fix what currently fails to convey the intended meaning.

Why is voice development treated as a core revision target rather than a cosmetic tweak?

The author compares the current manuscript’s voice to earlier work (Honey vinegar and holding a ghost), where the voice felt fully realized by the end. In the animal-sense draft, there are “pockets of brilliance,” but the overall voice is described as less developed—linguistically it doesn’t “shine” enough. The fix is framed as adding more sparkle and intensity, especially in chapter one, where small line-level adjustments produced a noticeable change in how the prose moves and matches the story’s tone.

What editing strategy helps manage uncertainty about a difficult subplot?

A separate subplot thread is flagged as unresolved—possibly cut later or reworked—but the author postpones deciding while completing other planned edits first. The reasoning is that later drafts will be easier once other structural “mess” is cleared, making it more feasible to integrate or remove the problematic thread with a clearer sense of the book’s overall shape.

How does the author diagnose pacing problems in a way that leads to actionable revision steps?

The author worries that slow sections may not feel slow to them because they’re exciting internally, but could read as sluggish to others. Part two is described as a “problem child” during drafting; editing improved quality, yet the author suspects it may still be too slow. The next draft will address this by condensing—cutting or tightening—if the pacing issue shows up as a pattern.

What structural change is being considered, and what problem is it meant to solve?

The author is considering removing the book’s “parts” structure and relying on chapter titles instead, aiming for a single smooth continuous arc in the published format. The author still likes chapter titles for cohesion and thematic chapter work, but believes the parts division helped drafting rather than the final reading experience—especially since the story is set in a compact time frame.

How does the author’s chapter chart function during revision planning?

A color-coded chart marks each chapter by readiness: “complete” (no more work needed), “strong” (needs detail/polish), “okay” (significant issues but not full overhaul), and “weak” (massive rethink). This becomes a practical targeting tool—for example, the author plans to push chapter 2 toward “complete” with detailing work, while chapters 11 and 13 (harmonic convergence and psychic birth) are flagged as major weak points needing restructuring.

What does the author expect feedback to do at different stages?

The author prefers to get as far as possible before feedback, but expects this book to need feedback earlier and more deeply than prior projects. Instead of only asking, “Is this conveying what I want?” the author anticipates needing help at the earlier stage where the draft isn’t doing what’s intended—meaning feedback will guide both meaning and execution, especially for intricate relationship dynamics.

Review Questions

  1. Which specific language goals (sparkle, electric intensity, tonal richness) are being used to measure whether the voice is improving?
  2. How does the author’s readiness chart change what they work on next—what makes a chapter “weak” versus “okay”?
  3. What structural and pacing adjustments are being considered to make the book read as one continuous arc rather than segmented parts?

Key Points

  1. 1

    The animal-sense manuscript is being revised through multiple developmental drafts, with voice and relationship conveyance treated as major revision targets rather than minor polish.

  2. 2

    Chapter one has already benefited from targeted line-level tweaks that add more “sparkle” and electric movement, but the overall voice still needs further development.

  3. 3

    A difficult subplot thread is intentionally deferred so other edits can proceed first, with the expectation that later drafts will make integration or removal easier.

  4. 4

    Pacing concerns persist—especially in part two and around the ending’s final scene—prompting plans for condensing and structural tightening.

  5. 5

    The author is considering removing the “parts” framework in favor of titled chapters to strengthen cohesion and create a smoother continuous arc.

  6. 6

    A color-coded chapter chart (complete/strong/okay/weak) is used to prioritize revision work, with chapters 11 and 13 identified as significant weak points.

  7. 7

    The author expects feedback to be necessary not only to confirm what’s working, but to correct where the story fails to convey intended meaning, particularly in intricate relationships.

Highlights

Voice work is the headline priority: the author wants the prose to feel more “sparkly” and electrically intense, and chapter one is already showing measurable gains.
Part two remains the recurring pacing and quality concern—editing helped, but the author still suspects it may be too slow on the page.
Chapter titles are being treated as a structural and thematic tool, tied to an uneasy new-age vibe reinforced by concepts like tarot-card naming and Susanna’s pop-psychology references.
A color-coded readiness chart is driving the revision plan, with chapters 11 and 13 singled out for major restructuring because a subplot currently feels inconsequential.

Topics

Mentioned

  • Susanna