Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Zettelkasten workflow in my note-taking app Flowtelic thumbnail

Zettelkasten workflow in my note-taking app Flowtelic

Martin Adams·
5 min read

Based on Martin Adams's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Flowtelic now assigns both **note types** and **workflow states** to notes, and navigation reflects that structure.

Briefing

Flowtelic’s latest workflow update turns note-taking into a guided pipeline—capturing ideas, turning reading into study notes, processing those notes into permanent “slip box” cards, and then using the results to drive writing and publishing. The core change is that notes now carry both a **note type** (what they are) and a **workflow state** (where they are in the process), with navigation updated to reflect that structure. Instead of letting useful material sit indefinitely, the system is designed to nudge users through small, repeatable steps so knowledge compounds over time.

At the center is a Zettelkasten-inspired model. Users start with an **inbox-style capture**: “idea” notes and “study notes” (literature notes derived from reading). When an item is ready, it moves through workflow states—such as **draft** and **ready to process**—until it reaches **complete**, representing a finalized permanent note stored in the app’s “slip box.” Flowtelic frames this as a practical adaptation of the Zettelkasten method: ideas and literature notes are processed into evergreen permanent notes that are meant to be linked and reused.

Flowtelic also introduces a clearer separation of roles inside the knowledge base. **Index notes** act like a map of content (similar to MOCs in Zettelkasten terms), organized alphabetically for fast browsing and linking to related notes. **Permanent notes** represent final, evergreen thoughts—“cards” intended to connect with other cards to form a durable knowledge system. **Reference notes** are treated differently: they store reusable citations (links to blog posts, books, or pages) without workflow states, functioning as lightweight bibliographic anchors.

To connect knowledge to output, the update adds **projects** as a work layer. Projects behave like “index cards for your work,” with their own navigation and lifecycle—backlog, in progress, and completion. Study notes can be linked directly into project notes, letting reading material feed specific writing tasks. The workflow supports iterative creation: a project can be worked on in short sessions, with effort increasing as the project becomes more complete. This is positioned as the mechanism for turning non-evergreen material into publishable artifacts.

Finally, Flowtelic expands organization beyond notes and projects with **books** and **people** collections. Books let users track what they’re reading and see what study notes and outputs connect to each book. People (such as authors and public speakers) provide another linking hub—e.g., connecting articles, TED talks, and books to a single figure to trace how ideas formed and how they later show up in content.

The update is presented as a testable prototype with local storage—no server syncing, no registration—and export/import to Markdown that preserves workflow states. Upcoming features focus on workflow tooling: visualization of progress and reminders to spend time on small steps (like studying an article, generating study notes, and organizing them into the permanent store). The overall aim is consistency—keeping users moving through the pipeline rather than losing momentum for months at a time.

Cornell Notes

Flowtelic’s Zettelkasten workflow update adds two organizing dimensions to notes: **note types** (idea, study, permanent, reference, index, project, book, person) and **workflow states** (e.g., draft → ready to process → complete). The system is built around capturing ideas and literature notes, then processing them into evergreen **permanent notes** stored in a slip-box style archive. **Index notes** provide top-level maps of content, while **reference notes** store citations without workflow. **Projects** connect the knowledge base to writing and publishing by linking study notes into backlog/in-progress/completed work. The app emphasizes consistency through incremental daily movement and supports local storage plus Markdown export/import that preserves workflow states.

How does Flowtelic operationalize the Zettelkasten “slip box” idea using note types and workflow states?

Flowtelic treats “ideas” and “study notes” as capture material, then uses workflow states to move them into the slip-box stage. Captured items can be marked as draft and then updated to “ready to process,” and once processed into the archive they can be marked “complete.” Permanent notes function as the evergreen “final thought” cards that users link together over time, while the workflow states track progress so items don’t stall between capture and archiving.

What’s the difference between index notes, permanent notes, and reference notes in this system?

Index notes are top-level maps of content (like MOCs) and are alphabetically sorted for browsing; they link out to related notes and help users formulate higher-level thinking. Permanent notes are the evergreen archive—finalized ideas intended to be linked with other permanent cards. Reference notes store citations (links to blog posts, books, or pages) and don’t carry workflow states; they’re meant for reuse rather than processing.

How do projects change the path from reading to publishing?

Projects act as work containers with their own navigation and lifecycle: backlog, in progress, and completion. Users can link study notes directly into a project, so reading becomes material for a specific output (e.g., a blog post). The workflow supports iterative writing—users can create note cards in short sessions and let projects “percolate” until they’re ready for more effort, then push them toward completion.

What role do books and people collections play beyond the core note archive?

Books and people provide specialized organization hubs. Books let users tag what they’re reading and then view outputs and study notes connected to that book. People (authors and public speakers) let users link articles, TED talks, and books to a single individual, helping trace how ideas were formed from that person’s work and how those ideas later appear in content.

Why does the app emphasize workflow consistency, and how is that supported technically?

The emphasis is on preventing long gaps where captured material never gets processed. The workflow states and updated navigation are meant to keep users moving through small steps—study, generate study notes, then organize into the permanent store—so knowledge compounds. Technically, the app uses local storage (no server syncing or registration) and supports Markdown export/import that preserves workflow states, so users don’t lose progress if they move notes offline.

Review Questions

  1. Which note types in Flowtelic are meant to become evergreen “slip box” content, and how do workflow states signal that transition?
  2. How do index notes and reference notes differ in purpose and in whether they participate in workflow states?
  3. Describe a plausible workflow path from capturing an idea to producing a publishable artifact using projects.

Key Points

  1. 1

    Flowtelic now assigns both **note types** and **workflow states** to notes, and navigation reflects that structure.

  2. 2

    The Zettelkasten-inspired pipeline moves captured ideas and study notes through states like draft and ready-to-process until they become **complete permanent notes** in the slip-box archive.

  3. 3

    **Index notes** function as alphabetically sorted maps (MOC-style) that link to related content for top-level organization.

  4. 4

    **Reference notes** store citations without workflow states, serving as reusable bibliographic anchors.

  5. 5

    **Projects** connect the knowledge base to writing and publishing with a backlog → in-progress → completion lifecycle and direct linking to study notes.

  6. 6

    Books and people add specialized organization layers so users can trace outputs back to what they read and who influenced their thinking.

  7. 7

    Workflow progress is preserved through local storage and Markdown export/import that retains workflow states, supporting offline work without losing consistency.

Highlights

The update’s biggest shift is turning note-taking into a tracked pipeline: note type + workflow state, with navigation designed to keep items moving.
Permanent notes are positioned as the evergreen “final thought” cards, while workflow states mark progress from capture to processed archive.
Projects are treated as work containers that link study notes into backlog/in-progress/completed writing tasks.
Markdown export/import preserves workflow states, so offline edits don’t break the system’s consistency.
Books and people become linking hubs that help users map outputs back to reading and influential figures.

Mentioned