Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How I Planned my PhD | 4 Year GANTT Chart in A4 Bullet Journal and Power Point | Digital Download thumbnail

How I Planned my PhD | 4 Year GANTT Chart in A4 Bullet Journal and Power Point | Digital Download

Ciara Feely·
5 min read

Based on Ciara Feely's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Build a month-by-month Gantt chart that sequences analysis first, then writing, so paper and thesis deadlines have a clear work runway.

Briefing

A four-year PhD plan is mapped out as a color-coded Gantt chart that turns an abstract research timeline into a month-by-month schedule of classes, analysis, paper writing, teaching/TA, conferences, holidays, and thesis work. The core value is practical: the chart makes deadlines and “what must happen before what” visible—so analysis work is scheduled ahead of paper submissions, conference deadlines are tied to deliverables, and recovery time (holidays) is treated as non-negotiable.

The plan spans roughly 2019–2023 and is built around a repeating rhythm common in computer science PhD work: collect or use data, run analysis and modeling, then write up results as papers or thesis chapters. Early on, the schedule includes a boot camp to bring students up to speed, followed by a stretch of coursework (mid-January to mid-May, and mid-September to mid-December). After the first year, the chart shifts away from classes toward teaching activities—specifically TA work—while keeping the same analysis-to-writing cycle.

Color coding distinguishes long, less-flexible commitments from research time. Yellow blocks mark fixed obligations such as boot camp and classes. An orange tone is reserved for analysis phases, which are treated as the engine of progress: half of an analysis period runs through December and January, then writing begins. Blue marks holidays, with an explicit emphasis on taking time off during a PhD to avoid burnout and to keep the overall plan realistic.

Paper production is scheduled as a sequence rather than a single event. One paper is already submitted by late February, followed by a short break, then a second paper moves through analysis and into writing. The chart also includes non-thesis activities that temporarily redirect focus—most notably an entrepreneurship course—plus conferences marked in green, with the expectation that submitted papers or general participation will align with those dates.

The schedule accounts for summer work beyond standard research cycles. It anticipates data collection during the summer, potential additional paper writing if new findings emerge, and an internship likely spanning three months in the second full year. The final year changes more noticeably: a live user study is planned over the summer, tied to following marathon runners up to an October marathon, and then the remainder of the timeline shifts toward finishing analysis and producing the thesis in a “main finished version,” ideally by December but more likely around three and a half years after starting.

To make the plan usable, the creator pairs an A4 bullet journal version with a digital version built in a PowerPoint-style table. In the digital setup, each month is represented as a grid of small cells (roughly week-sized), and filling the chart is done by selecting cells and applying color. The digital table is positioned as fast to customize and update—after the paper version is already planned—taking under 10 minutes to fill once the structure exists. The overall message is that a visual Gantt chart helps researchers coordinate papers, conferences, and thesis milestones while keeping time off and fixed commitments firmly in view.

Cornell Notes

A four-year PhD timeline is organized as a color-coded Gantt chart that links research tasks to real deadlines. The schedule follows a repeating cycle: analyze data and model results, then write papers or thesis chapters, with breaks and holidays built in as planned blocks. Early months include boot camp and coursework; later years shift toward TA/teaching while keeping analysis-to-writing as the core workflow. Conferences, an entrepreneurship course, an internship, and a final-year live user study are placed so deliverables line up with submission dates. A digital PowerPoint table version mirrors the A4 bullet journal and is designed to be quick to update, making it easier to track progress and adjust when plans change.

How does the plan structure PhD work across years, and why does that matter for meeting deadlines?

The timeline is built around a predictable research rhythm: data work leads into analysis and modeling, which then feeds writing for papers or thesis chapters. Analysis blocks are scheduled ahead of writing periods so there’s time to turn results into submissions. Holidays are explicitly marked as blue blocks, reinforcing that recovery time is part of the plan rather than something squeezed in later. This sequencing is meant to keep conference and journal deadlines aligned with the work required to produce something to submit.

What role do fixed commitments (like classes and boot camp) play in the Gantt chart’s color system?

Fixed obligations are treated as less flexible and therefore get their own color blocks (yellow for items like boot camp and coursework). Coursework appears in two main windows early on (mid-January to mid-May, and mid-September to mid-December). By separating these commitments from research time, the chart clarifies when analysis and writing can realistically happen and when teaching or classes will reduce available research hours.

How are conferences, internships, and courses integrated without derailing the main research cycle?

Conferences are marked separately (green) so submission deadlines can be seen in relation to analysis and writing. An entrepreneurship course is placed as a temporary focus shift, and an internship is scheduled for the summer in the second full year (expected to cover three months). The chart keeps the core pattern intact by treating these as time blocks that redirect effort while still planning subsequent analysis and write-up phases around them.

What changes in the final year, and how does the plan handle a long-running user study?

The final year is more different because it includes a live user study running over the summer and tied to a specific October marathon. The schedule anticipates following marathon runners up to that event, then uses the remaining time to finish analysis and write the thesis in a “main finished version.” The plan aims for completion by December but expects it may land around three and a half years after starting in October.

Why include a digital PowerPoint table version in addition to the A4 bullet journal chart?

The digital version is designed for speed and flexibility. Each month is represented as a grid of small cells (roughly week-sized), and filling it in is done by selecting cells and applying colors. Because it’s a table, it’s easier to customize or update later than a static paper layout. The creator emphasizes that the paper plan is done first, then the digital chart can be filled in quickly (under 10 minutes) and reused.

Review Questions

  1. If you were to copy this planning approach, what would you schedule first: analysis blocks or writing blocks—and what dependency does the chart assume?
  2. How does the chart’s treatment of holidays (as dedicated blue blocks) affect the realism of long-term PhD planning?
  3. Which elements in the plan are most likely to force schedule changes, and how does the color-coded system help manage those shifts?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Build a month-by-month Gantt chart that sequences analysis first, then writing, so paper and thesis deadlines have a clear work runway.

  2. 2

    Treat fixed commitments (boot camp, coursework, other long obligations) as dedicated blocks so research time is planned around them.

  3. 3

    Mark holidays explicitly; recovery time is scheduled as part of progress, not as an afterthought.

  4. 4

    Use separate color categories for analysis, writing, teaching/TA, conferences, and non-thesis courses to make tradeoffs visible at a glance.

  5. 5

    Integrate conferences and submission deadlines by placing them alongside the analysis and writing work needed to produce deliverables.

  6. 6

    Plan summer work beyond routine research by including data collection, potential additional papers, and internships as time blocks.

  7. 7

    Mirror the plan in a digital table (e.g., PowerPoint-style grid) so updates are fast when circumstances change.

Highlights

The plan’s core workflow is a repeating loop: analyze and model, then write results into papers or thesis chapters—scheduled so writing never starts without completed work.
Holidays are color-coded and blocked out, reflecting a deliberate strategy to prevent burnout during long PhD stretches.
The final-year timeline hinges on a live user study tied to an October marathon, then pivots immediately to thesis writing and remaining analysis.
A PowerPoint-style grid makes the Gantt chart easy to update: select cells, apply colors, and revise quickly without rebuilding the whole layout.

Topics

Mentioned