HOW TO FIND YOUR WRITING STYLE & AUTHOR'S VOICE // tips to find your author's voice
Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Write in your natural style first; forcing an aspirational voice can stall output and produce purple prose.
Briefing
Finding an author’s voice isn’t something that can be rushed or forced into existence overnight—it solidifies through sustained writing practice, comfort with drafting, and gradual refinement. The core message is that style “clicks” when writers keep producing work in a way that feels natural to them, then steadily sharpen it over time. That matters because many newer writers stall or get discouraged when their pages don’t sound like published work; the fix isn’t more pressure, it’s writing more consistently in their own voice until it becomes recognizable.
A first principle drives most of the advice: write in your natural style, not the elaborate, flowery version you think you should be able to produce. New writers often chase an aspirational sound—lush, beautiful, “published”—and stop writing when the words don’t match that ideal. Jaylen warns that forcing an unnatural style is a common path to “purple prose,” where overwrought language replaces authentic voice. Instead, the goal is to keep drafting even if early sentences feel rough or “practice words.” Volume matters because repeated exposure to your own writing patterns is what lets your style develop heightened and more interesting characteristics.
That practice-first approach also means embracing imperfection. Perfectionism blocks the feedback loop that builds voice: writers improve by writing lots of words at a realistic pace, not by meticulously crafting a few “perfect” paragraphs. The aim is not flawless first drafts, but drafts that don’t require constant forcing—eventually making style feel natural.
Line editing is presented as the fastest practical lever for strengthening voice once drafting is underway. Learning to line edit—cutting redundant adverbs, eliminating filters, and rearranging sentences for punch—shifts improvements backward into the first draft. A university writing workshop example illustrates the payoff: early in the semester, stories sounded similar because everyone made the same mistakes; after rigorous line editing, individual styles became distinct enough that a professor could identify authors by paragraph alone. Line editing for others also accelerates skill, because it trains writers to spot patterns and revise with intention.
Clarity is treated as the non-negotiable foundation. Even the most figurative or intricate prose fails if readers can’t extract meaning. The advice is to prioritize clear communication first, then add artistry where it supports understanding.
Voice also comes from word choice hierarchy: build style on strong words—especially nouns and verbs—then use adverbs and adjectives only when necessary. Reading widely is another major input channel: it improves vocabulary and exposes writers to sentence structures, but the guidance is to read for influence that seeps into the subconscious rather than consciously imitating a specific author.
Finally, style development includes restraint. Not every sentence needs to be the “best sentence ever.” Over-embellishing can drown out voice and reduce impact. Simple sentences have a job, and the most impressive lines will stand out without being forced into constant peak performance. Style will continue to morph as writers change, shift across projects, and revisit earlier work—so “regression” is often just evolution.
Cornell Notes
An author’s voice develops through time, repetition, and comfort with drafting—not through rushing or forcing a specific “aspirational” style. Writers should draft in their natural voice, embrace imperfection, and prioritize consistent word output so style can emerge organically. Line editing is the key refinement tool: cutting redundancy, removing filters, and tightening sentence structure can make the improvements show up earlier, even in first drafts. Clarity comes first, and word choice should lean on strong nouns and verbs rather than relying on adverbs and adjectives. Reading widely builds subconscious technique and vocabulary, while restraint prevents “purple prose” by allowing some sentences to stay simple.
Why does forcing a “dream” writing style often backfire for newer writers?
What’s the practical difference between writing for voice and editing for voice?
How does clarity function as a foundation for voice?
What word-level strategy helps voice emerge without over-decorating?
Why is reading recommended, and why avoid conscious emulation?
What does the advice “not every sentence has to be the best sentence ever” prevent?
Review Questions
- What are the risks of writing in a style that feels unnatural to you, and how does that relate to “purple prose”?
- How does line editing change what happens in the first draft, according to the transcript?
- Which parts of speech are prioritized for building voice, and why?
Key Points
- 1
Write in your natural style first; forcing an aspirational voice can stall output and produce purple prose.
- 2
Develop voice through consistent practice and realistic word output, not through perfectionism or waiting for inspiration to “click.”
- 3
Use line editing to strengthen voice: cut redundant adverbs, remove filters, and tighten sentence structure so improvements show up earlier.
- 4
Prioritize clarity over artfulness so readers can extract meaning, even in figurative or intricate prose.
- 5
Build voice on strong nouns and verbs; use adverbs and adjectives sparingly and intentionally.
- 6
Read widely for subconscious technique and vocabulary growth, without consciously copying a specific author’s style.
- 7
Let some sentences stay simple; over-embellishing every line can drown out voice and reduce impact.