Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
HOW TO FIND YOUR WRITING STYLE & AUTHOR'S VOICE // tips to find your author's voice thumbnail

HOW TO FIND YOUR WRITING STYLE & AUTHOR'S VOICE // tips to find your author's voice

ShaelinWrites·
5 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Write in your natural style first; forcing an aspirational voice can stall output and produce purple prose.

Briefing

Finding an author’s voice isn’t something that can be rushed or forced into existence overnight—it solidifies through sustained writing practice, comfort with drafting, and gradual refinement. The core message is that style “clicks” when writers keep producing work in a way that feels natural to them, then steadily sharpen it over time. That matters because many newer writers stall or get discouraged when their pages don’t sound like published work; the fix isn’t more pressure, it’s writing more consistently in their own voice until it becomes recognizable.

A first principle drives most of the advice: write in your natural style, not the elaborate, flowery version you think you should be able to produce. New writers often chase an aspirational sound—lush, beautiful, “published”—and stop writing when the words don’t match that ideal. Jaylen warns that forcing an unnatural style is a common path to “purple prose,” where overwrought language replaces authentic voice. Instead, the goal is to keep drafting even if early sentences feel rough or “practice words.” Volume matters because repeated exposure to your own writing patterns is what lets your style develop heightened and more interesting characteristics.

That practice-first approach also means embracing imperfection. Perfectionism blocks the feedback loop that builds voice: writers improve by writing lots of words at a realistic pace, not by meticulously crafting a few “perfect” paragraphs. The aim is not flawless first drafts, but drafts that don’t require constant forcing—eventually making style feel natural.

Line editing is presented as the fastest practical lever for strengthening voice once drafting is underway. Learning to line edit—cutting redundant adverbs, eliminating filters, and rearranging sentences for punch—shifts improvements backward into the first draft. A university writing workshop example illustrates the payoff: early in the semester, stories sounded similar because everyone made the same mistakes; after rigorous line editing, individual styles became distinct enough that a professor could identify authors by paragraph alone. Line editing for others also accelerates skill, because it trains writers to spot patterns and revise with intention.

Clarity is treated as the non-negotiable foundation. Even the most figurative or intricate prose fails if readers can’t extract meaning. The advice is to prioritize clear communication first, then add artistry where it supports understanding.

Voice also comes from word choice hierarchy: build style on strong words—especially nouns and verbs—then use adverbs and adjectives only when necessary. Reading widely is another major input channel: it improves vocabulary and exposes writers to sentence structures, but the guidance is to read for influence that seeps into the subconscious rather than consciously imitating a specific author.

Finally, style development includes restraint. Not every sentence needs to be the “best sentence ever.” Over-embellishing can drown out voice and reduce impact. Simple sentences have a job, and the most impressive lines will stand out without being forced into constant peak performance. Style will continue to morph as writers change, shift across projects, and revisit earlier work—so “regression” is often just evolution.

Cornell Notes

An author’s voice develops through time, repetition, and comfort with drafting—not through rushing or forcing a specific “aspirational” style. Writers should draft in their natural voice, embrace imperfection, and prioritize consistent word output so style can emerge organically. Line editing is the key refinement tool: cutting redundancy, removing filters, and tightening sentence structure can make the improvements show up earlier, even in first drafts. Clarity comes first, and word choice should lean on strong nouns and verbs rather than relying on adverbs and adjectives. Reading widely builds subconscious technique and vocabulary, while restraint prevents “purple prose” by allowing some sentences to stay simple.

Why does forcing a “dream” writing style often backfire for newer writers?

Chasing an elaborate, flowery sound can stall production when drafts don’t match the ideal. The transcript frames this as a major mistake: forcing language that isn’t natural to the writer prevents genuine style development and commonly leads to “purple prose,” where overwrought phrasing replaces authentic voice.

What’s the practical difference between writing for voice and editing for voice?

Drafting builds the raw connection to your natural style through repeated practice and comfort with writing. Editing—especially line editing—then heightens that style by tightening sentences: removing redundant adverbs, eliminating filters, and rearranging for shorter, punchier phrasing. The claim is that rigorous line editing trains the habits to appear earlier, reducing the need for many later revision passes.

How does clarity function as a foundation for voice?

Even highly artistic prose is ineffective if it doesn’t convey meaning. The transcript emphasizes that writing is only as strong as it is clear to readers, particularly when the style is figurative or intricate. Art can be powerful, but clarity must come first so readers can take away the intended meaning.

What word-level strategy helps voice emerge without over-decorating?

Voice is built on strong words—especially nouns and verbs, described as the “loadbearing” parts of a sentence. Adverbs and adjectives should be used intentionally and only when necessary; often, removing them improves the writing. Articles, prepositions, and conjunctions matter for grammar and nuance, but the transcript argues they’re not where voice is primarily forged.

Why is reading recommended, and why avoid conscious emulation?

Reading supplies “word input”: vocabulary growth, exposure to new sentence structures, and keeping language patterns active in the mind. But consciously imitating a specific author blocks authentic voice because it pushes writers to force their style rather than develop it naturally. The goal is influence that settles into the subconscious.

What does the advice “not every sentence has to be the best sentence ever” prevent?

It prevents over-embellishment. The transcript describes a phase where every sentence was treated like it needed maximum flair, leading to “too purple” prose and devices used when they weren’t needed. Allowing utilitarian sentences (like “he turned around”) preserves impact by saving stylistic energy for moments that truly deserve extra emphasis.

Review Questions

  1. What are the risks of writing in a style that feels unnatural to you, and how does that relate to “purple prose”?
  2. How does line editing change what happens in the first draft, according to the transcript?
  3. Which parts of speech are prioritized for building voice, and why?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Write in your natural style first; forcing an aspirational voice can stall output and produce purple prose.

  2. 2

    Develop voice through consistent practice and realistic word output, not through perfectionism or waiting for inspiration to “click.”

  3. 3

    Use line editing to strengthen voice: cut redundant adverbs, remove filters, and tighten sentence structure so improvements show up earlier.

  4. 4

    Prioritize clarity over artfulness so readers can extract meaning, even in figurative or intricate prose.

  5. 5

    Build voice on strong nouns and verbs; use adverbs and adjectives sparingly and intentionally.

  6. 6

    Read widely for subconscious technique and vocabulary growth, without consciously copying a specific author’s style.

  7. 7

    Let some sentences stay simple; over-embellishing every line can drown out voice and reduce impact.

Highlights

Voice emerges from practice and comfort with drafting; it can’t be expedited by forcing a style overnight.
Rigorous line editing can make style improvements appear in first drafts, reducing the need for endless later revisions.
Clarity is the baseline: beautiful prose that doesn’t communicate meaning fails readers.
Strong nouns and verbs carry voice more reliably than relying on adverbs and adjectives.
Not every sentence needs to be peak performance—simple sentences keep the style from turning purple and overworked.

Mentioned