Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Use AI Agents to increase productivity, here’s how thumbnail

Use AI Agents to increase productivity, here’s how

David Ondrej·
6 min read

Based on David Ondrej's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Vectal is ranked as the most AI-first app because it emphasizes AI autonomy and agent-driven task execution rather than AI features layered onto a traditional task manager.

Briefing

AI-first task management is separating the winners from the “AI-on-top” incumbents, and Vectal is positioned as the clear standout for autonomous productivity. The comparison ranks five popular productivity apps—Notion, To-doist, Vectal, ClickUp, and Trello—across seven criteria, with the biggest differentiator being how much work the AI can do on its own (AI autonomy), how quickly the product ships improvements, and how deeply AI is integrated into day-to-day task execution.

Across the scoring, Vectal repeatedly comes out ahead because it treats AI agents as core infrastructure rather than a feature add-on. Notion earns a middle-to-strong score for ease of use and customizability, but its AI assistant is described as “not fully autonomous.” To-doist is rated as extremely easy to use yet weak on AI autonomy and integrations, with the most striking gap being a near-total lack of autonomous agent capability. ClickUp and Trello land in the middle: both are considered usable, but both are portrayed as cautious about autonomous features and limited in agent depth.

The autonomy gap is framed as a product philosophy problem. Big incumbents, with large customer bases, are said to have less incentive to innovate aggressively with autonomous behavior because they risk upsetting existing users. That caution shows up in the ratings: To-doist and ClickUp are described as having essentially no autonomous agent work, while Trello is similarly constrained. Vectal, by contrast, is described as having multiple agents that can run without constant user attention.

The ranking also leans heavily on “future proofing.” Vectal is characterized as the most future-ready because it’s “AI first” and built around agents, while To-doist is called the least future-proof due to slow movement and an older product foundation. Notion is treated as a reasonable second, but still behind Vectal in AI-forward momentum.

Where the comparison becomes most concrete is the agent count and release velocity. Notion is credited with six AI agents. ClickUp has three. To-doist and Trello each have one. Vectal has 13 AI agents today, and the argument is that the pace of shipping makes that number likely to grow quickly. Vectal is also described as releasing features at a much faster rate than the others—“literally every day” in the account—while To-doist is portrayed as sluggish, taking months for small UI changes.

The second half of the transcript shifts from scoring to a hands-on walkthrough of Vectal’s workflow. The onboarding is presented as critical because it feeds user context—work description, projects, goals, and extra details—into the system. After setup, Vectal’s task list and chat agent are tightly coupled: prompts can create tasks, adjust task importance, and reorganize priorities. A standout feature is the “background agent,” activated per task via a one-click button, which then performs a multi-stage process: reasoning, web search, and summarization into actionable steps. The app also includes an “ideas” inbox that can be converted into tasks or notes, plus “notes” that behave like mini documents and can be populated via web search. “Ultra search” is described as a context-aware web research tool that uses Perplexity deep research and can save results directly into notes.

Overall, the core claim is that AI-first design—agents that can autonomously plan, search, and update tasks—translates into real time savings, not just smarter text generation. The transcript also emphasizes that Vectal’s fast-moving startup model is expected to keep improving agent capability, speed, reliability, and integrations such as one-click imports and team plans.

Cornell Notes

The transcript ranks five productivity apps by how “AI-first” they are, focusing on whether AI agents can act autonomously and save time. Vectal is positioned as the leader because it’s built around multiple AI agents (13) that can run in the background, perform reasoning plus web search, and update tasks without constant user input. Notion is comparatively strong on customizability and has six agents, but its AI is described as not fully autonomous. To-doist and Trello are rated weak on autonomy and agent depth (one agent each), while ClickUp sits in the middle with three agents. The practical walkthrough shows how Vectal’s onboarding context powers task creation, prioritization, project organization, and context-aware “Ultra search,” with results saved into tasks, notes, and reminders.

What does “AI autonomy” mean in this comparison, and why does it drive the ranking?

AI autonomy is treated as how much the system can do on its own—running agents that organize, plan, and update tasks without the user watching 24/7. In the ratings, To-doist and ClickUp are described as having essentially no autonomous agent work, Trello is similarly constrained, and Notion’s assistant is characterized as not fully autonomous. Vectal is singled out for having multiple agents that can run in the background, including a one-click “background agent” that performs reasoning, web search, and summarization for a selected task.

How many AI agents does each app have, and what pattern does that reveal?

The transcript gives these counts: Notion has six AI agents, To-doist has one, Vectal has 13, ClickUp has three, and Trello has one. The pattern is that the apps with more agents also score better on autonomy and future readiness. Vectal’s 13-agent setup is paired with a claim that its faster shipping cadence will likely push the number higher soon.

Why is Vectal’s onboarding context described as essential rather than optional?

Onboarding collects details like a work description, current projects, main goals, and extra context (e.g., where the user lives). That context is then used to personalize how agents create tasks, prioritize them, and decide what to research. The walkthrough warns against rushing onboarding because the system uses the provided context to generate more relevant task instructions and agent actions.

What is the “background agent,” and how does it work on a task?

The background agent is an autonomous agent tied to individual tasks. A user can hover a task and click “activate vectoral agent” (one click). The agent then runs a multi-stage process: (1) fast reasoning about how to complete the task, (2) web search when needed, and (3) summarization into clear steps. The transcript claims this can take 20–30 minutes (sometimes longer) and that Pro enables running it on multiple tasks, while the free plan limits concurrent background tasks.

How do “ideas,” “tasks,” and “notes” differ, and how do agents move items between them?

Ideas are a low-pressure brain-dump inbox for quick thoughts or half-formed items. Ideas can be converted into tasks or notes, or deleted. Notes are positioned as long-term saved information—described as mini Google Docs with formatting options. Agents can convert ideas into tasks/notes automatically; for example, a prompt can convert “walk the dog” into a note, and web-search-driven workflows can generate multiple notes from a single prompt.

What makes “Ultra search” different from typical web research in other tools?

Ultra search is described as context-aware: it takes the user’s onboarding context plus active tasks/goals into account when deciding how to search the web. It also uses Perplexity deep research (noted as requiring a $20/month Perplexity subscription for access) and is presented as faster than long “chat research” workflows. Results can then be saved into multiple notes automatically.

Review Questions

  1. Which scoring categories most directly measure time savings in this framework, and how do agent counts relate to those categories?
  2. How does Vectal’s onboarding context influence what the chat agent and background agent do after setup?
  3. What are the practical differences between converting an idea into a task versus converting it into a note, and when would each be used?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Vectal is ranked as the most AI-first app because it emphasizes AI autonomy and agent-driven task execution rather than AI features layered onto a traditional task manager.

  2. 2

    Notion is rated as medium on autonomy but strong on customizability, while To-doist and Trello are portrayed as weak on autonomous agent capability.

  3. 3

    The transcript assigns explicit AI agent counts: Notion (6), To-doist (1), Vectal (13), ClickUp (3), Trello (1), and uses those counts to support the autonomy and future-readiness claims.

  4. 4

    Future proofing is tied to product velocity and AI-first design; Vectal is described as the most future-ready, while To-doist is called the least future-proof.

  5. 5

    Vectal’s onboarding is presented as a performance lever: richer user context improves task creation, prioritization, and the relevance of agent actions.

  6. 6

    The background agent is a one-click, multi-stage workflow (reasoning → web search → summarization) that can update tasks while the user is away, with Pro enabling broader background execution.

  7. 7

    Ultra search is framed as context-aware web research that can save results directly into notes, leveraging Perplexity deep research.

Highlights

Vectal is positioned as the clear winner because it combines AI autonomy with a high agent count (13), while To-doist and Trello each have only one agent.
The background agent can be activated per task with a single button and runs reasoning plus web search to produce step-by-step outputs after the user returns.
Ultra search is described as taking user context into account when choosing web queries and then saving findings into notes automatically.
The transcript treats “AI-first” as a product philosophy: agents that can act on tasks and UI, not just chat-based assistance.

Topics

Mentioned

  • AI
  • GPT
  • UI