Why you need to QUIT Notion for Obsidian MD... (App Comparison for Note Taking and Productivity)
Based on John Mavrick Ch.'s video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Use Notion for task and project management because database views plus rich properties (dates, multi-select, checkboxes) make sorting and filtering efficient.
Briefing
Notion and Obsidian both handle notes, tasks, and journaling—but the clearest split in day-to-day usefulness is this: Notion’s database views and rich properties make it stronger for planning and structured workflows, while Obsidian’s wikilinks, graph/backlinks, and fast note-taking experience make it stronger for building an interconnected knowledge base.
For task and project management, the preference leans toward Notion. Notion’s database views—Kanban boards, calendar views, and simple lists—let tasks be organized in the way the user wants, including moving and embedding content on a single page. The biggest differentiator is property support. Notion supports multiple property types such as dates, multi-select fields, and checkboxes, which makes sorting and filtering straightforward through view changes. Obsidian can do tables and Kanban via plugins, but layout flexibility is more limited, and metadata is largely text-based, which makes advanced sorting and filtering more tedious. In practice, the workflow described uses separate Kanban boards for monthly goals, projects, and even YouTube-related work, each with different viewing options and sorting methods.
For note-taking, the balance flips toward Obsidian. The Zettelkasten-style approach is central: wikilinks make it easy to connect ideas across notes, then surface those relationships through graph view and backlinks rather than relying only on folders. Obsidian’s community ecosystem is also framed as a practical advantage—active Discord discussions and weekly roundup content help users discover plugins and workflows that improve the system over time.
Performance and speed reinforce that choice. Notion’s page loading and lag are cited as friction, while Obsidian’s hotkeys, plugins, and “note quick switcher” are described as making creation and navigation more fluid. Templates and cursor locations further speed up note creation, and the markdown-based editing experience is treated as a near-equivalent to Notion’s formatting capabilities once users adapt.
Both apps can support daily and weekly notes, but the user’s personal division of labor is specific: Obsidian for daily journaling and Notion for weekly reviews. Daily reflections can be expanded in Obsidian by adding prompts and connecting new thoughts to related ideas inside the vault. Weekly reviews benefit from Notion’s database views and inline metadata, including graphs to visualize metrics like energy levels across a week. For planning future work, Notion’s databases are also positioned as more convenient when tasks and schedules need to live alongside each other.
The practical takeaway is a hybrid workflow: use Obsidian for school notes and concept mapping, then use Notion for assignments, study plans, timetables, and collaboration needs. Obsidian’s flashcard and active review options are highlighted for exam prep, while Notion’s shareable links and online editing are presented as better suited for teamwork. The overall message is less about picking a single “winner” and more about matching each app to the kind of thinking—interlinked knowledge versus structured planning—that matters most in that part of life.
Cornell Notes
The core tradeoff is clear: Notion excels at structured planning through database views and rich properties, while Obsidian excels at building connected knowledge using wikilinks, graph/backlinks, and a fast, hotkey-driven note workflow. For tasks and projects, Notion’s date, multi-select, and checkbox properties make sorting and filtering easy by changing views. For note-taking and journaling, Obsidian’s Zettelkasten approach helps turn scattered notes into an interconnected web, letting users navigate ideas via graph view and backlinks. A hybrid setup—Obsidian for daily notes and Obsidian-based knowledge expansion, Notion for weekly reviews and planning—leverages the strengths of both.
Why is Notion favored for task and project management in this workflow?
How does Obsidian’s note-taking approach differ from folder-based organization?
What practical advantages make Obsidian feel faster for daily note work?
How does the hybrid daily/weekly journaling setup use each app differently?
When does the workflow recommend using Notion instead of Obsidian for collaboration?
How are exam review and study planning handled across the two tools?
Review Questions
- If you need heavy sorting and filtering across tasks, which specific Notion features (property types and views) matter most, and why?
- How do wikilinks plus graph view/backlinks change the way you navigate your notes compared with folder-only systems?
- What would a hybrid workflow look like if your priority is daily reflection plus weekly metric tracking? Which app would you assign to each and what features would you use?
Key Points
- 1
Use Notion for task and project management because database views plus rich properties (dates, multi-select, checkboxes) make sorting and filtering efficient.
- 2
Use Obsidian for note-taking when the goal is building an interconnected knowledge base through wikilinks, graph view, and backlinks.
- 3
Obsidian’s hotkeys, note quick switcher, templates, and sliding panes are positioned as major speed advantages for day-to-day writing.
- 4
Notion’s inline metadata and graphs are well-suited for weekly journaling metrics like energy levels.
- 5
A practical split is Obsidian for daily notes and expansion, Notion for weekly reviews and planning in the same place as tasks.
- 6
Obsidian supports active exam review via flash cards, while Notion is better for shareable links and online collaboration.
- 7
Adopt a hybrid workflow rather than forcing one app to do everything, matching each tool to the type of thinking required.