Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
My true feelings about Notion (Yes, I'm still using it) thumbnail

My true feelings about Notion (Yes, I'm still using it)

Red Gregory·
4 min read

Based on Red Gregory's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Notion can handle complex personal workflows and large databases, but performance depends heavily on how advanced features are used.

Briefing

Notion still works for everyday productivity and complex personal databases, but heavy use of certain “power” features can make it noticeably slow—so slow that it can derail shipping a template. The clearest pain point comes from database roll-ups: when multiple databases connect and a database view relies on many roll-ups, updates force those roll-ups to recalculate, creating lag. A template the creator was preparing for launch became unusable in practice once Notion’s performance dropped, and the culprit traced back to extensive roll-ups.

The other performance snag is synced blocks. While synced blocks are positioned as a newer feature, the workflow can become sluggish when undoing or changing sync relationships—unsyncing multiple blocks from a synced block can take a long time. Together, these issues shape a practical rule: Notion can handle complexity well, but using roll-ups and synced blocks too liberally—especially inside databases with lots of roll-up activity—can turn smooth work into waiting.

Despite those drawbacks, the overall verdict remains positive. For personal use—task management, personal notes, and even school note-taking—Notion is described as consistently strong. The creator also runs a large family-tree database with thousands of entries and reports no major issues there, suggesting that scale alone isn’t the problem. Instead, the performance hit correlates more with advanced property usage and the number of roll-ups involved.

A second theme is that Notion experiences split into two camps: users who build their own systems for personal life, and template creators who must design for long-term performance in other people’s workspaces. Template creation is framed as harder than it looks because templates need testing over time, not just at launch. Feedback from users who adopted a template and then added lots of entries eventually revealed slowdowns—again linked to roll-ups—reinforcing that what feels fine in development may degrade under real usage.

On the “should I switch?” question, the guidance is pragmatic. Notion and Obsidian are presented as the two best-fit options, while Rome Research is discouraged as harder to learn and more advanced. The creator’s default advice to others is to try both and choose what fits, though personal preference leans toward Notion for its database views, table visualization, and the ability to connect databases in ways that feel like “Word in Excel’s world,” mixing document-style flexibility with spreadsheet-like structure.

The bottom line: Notion remains a go-to tool, but performance depends on how it’s used. If someone plans to rely on many roll-ups and synced blocks—especially across interconnected databases—they should expect lag and design accordingly, or risk templates and workflows slowing down at the worst possible time.

Cornell Notes

Notion is still the creator’s main tool for tasks, notes, school, and large personal databases, but performance can collapse when advanced features are used heavily. The biggest slowdown comes from database roll-ups: when multiple connected databases feed into a database with many roll-ups, updates trigger recalculations that lag. Synced blocks can also be slow, particularly when unsyncing multiple blocks. Template creation is harder than personal setup because templates must stay fast as users add entries over time, and roll-ups can cause gradual degradation. The creator recommends trying Notion or Obsidian, while Rome Research is viewed as harder to learn and less practical for most people.

What specific Notion features are most associated with slowdown, and why?

Database roll-ups and synced blocks. Roll-ups create an extra “window” between connected databases; when several databases are connected and each connection implies roll-ups, updates in those source databases force the roll-ups to refresh. That recalculation can lag, especially when a database contains many roll-ups. Synced blocks can also become sluggish—unsyncing multiple blocks from a synced block can take a long time.

Why did a planned Notion gamification template get postponed?

The template was built with many roll-ups, and once Notion performance became super slow, it couldn’t be launched as planned. The creator traced the slowdown to the heavy roll-up usage inside the template, meaning the system would likely degrade for users as data and updates accumulated.

How does the creator’s experience differ between personal use and template/content creation?

Personal use is described as almost always positive, including large-scale work like a family-tree database with thousands of entries. Template/content creation is harder because templates must be tested for long-term use. Users may add lots of entries over time, and that’s when roll-up-driven slowdowns can appear—leading to feedback like “it’s cool, but it gets slow after extended use.”

What guidance is given for people deciding between Notion, Obsidian, and Rome Research?

The creator would recommend Notion or Obsidian, and not Rome Research because it’s considered more advanced and harder to learn. The practical approach is to try both Notion and Obsidian and pick what feels right. Preference leans toward Notion due to database views, table visualization, and connecting databases.

What makes Notion appealing compared with other tools, according to the creator?

Notion’s database structure and visualization. The creator likes seeing tables, using database views, and connecting databases so information can flow between them. They liken the feel to “Word in Excel’s world,” capturing the blend of document-style flexibility with spreadsheet-like organization.

Review Questions

  1. Which Notion feature refreshes and recalculates in a way that can cause lag when multiple databases are connected?
  2. What long-term testing problem makes template creation harder than personal setup?
  3. Why might a template that feels fast at launch become slow after users add many entries?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Notion can handle complex personal workflows and large databases, but performance depends heavily on how advanced features are used.

  2. 2

    Database roll-ups are the most common cause of lag when many roll-ups exist or when multiple connected databases update frequently.

  3. 3

    Synced blocks can become slow to manage, especially when unsyncing multiple blocks from a synced block.

  4. 4

    Template creators face a different challenge than personal users: templates must stay fast as other people add data over time.

  5. 5

    The creator’s practical recommendation is to consider Notion or Obsidian and avoid Rome Research for most users due to its higher learning curve.

  6. 6

    Preference for Notion is driven by database views, table visualization, and the ability to connect databases in a structured way.

Highlights

Heavy roll-up usage across connected databases can turn Notion sluggish because updates force roll-ups to recalculate.
Unsyncing multiple synced blocks can take a long time, making synced blocks a potential workflow bottleneck.
Personal Notion use stays strong even at scale, but template performance can degrade as users add entries.
Template creation requires long-term testing, since slowdowns may only show up after extended use.
Notion and Obsidian are the recommended pair; Rome Research is viewed as harder to learn and less practical.

Topics